Report of the NGO Committee for Disarmament's demonstration, meetings with the Ambassadors of British and French missions, progress on Mayors of Peace Initiative and forthcoming events
Geneva – 5 August 2004
There was a lot of media and press coverage including interviews with the main
speakers. I gave one interview to Simon Pettite journalist of Le Courrier. I
told him about the latest developments in the Mutual Defense Agreement (MDA)
between UK and US, Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI), Dangers of mini
nukes and buster bunker bombs and security in South Asia specially India and
Pakistan. I also gave him a copy of my book "Arms No More" for review
in his paper.
We were delayed so much at the Hiroshima Commemoration that when we reached the Conference on Disarmament, the public session was over. We were told that the Japanese Ambassador had presented a paper which advocated the implementation of articles in the NPT and a strict verification regime controlling the (future) Fissile Material Cut off Treaty (FMCT).
Japan and Morocco delivered statements to the Conference on Disarmament a gist
of which is as follows:
Japan's Ambassador Yoshiki Mine welcomed the statement made by the United States last week concerning its policy review of the Fissile Material Cut Off Treaty (FMCT), "a new window of opportunity for the CD" which Japan "hope(s)...will lead to the commencement of negotiations" on the long awaited treaty. While the US had stated that they do not believe that verification of an FMCT is achievable, Japan reiterated its belief that an FMCT "should be effectively verifiable...thereby ensuring credibility of the treaty."
Japan reminded the CD that both the 1995 and the 2000 NPT Review Conferences
called for the commencement of these negotiations, and that verifiability of the
treaty is part of the Shannon Mandate, the most
likely basis for future negotiations. Last week the US had also proposed
banning the sale and export of persistent landmines, a proposal to which many,
including Canada and France (see CD Advisory, August 3), reacted with
caution. Japan echoed these concerns, stating that while the US proposal
"may have certain significance among non-States Parties to the Ottawa
Convention...Japan is of the view that it is important to first work toward the
reinforcement and universalization of existing frameworks." (emphasis
added). Ambassador Omar Hilale of Morocco, President of the CD, announced
that he would be distributing a questionnaire in advance of upcoming informal
plenary meetings, Tuesday, 10 August and Thursday, 12 August, for consideration
of the "methodology of the programme of work."
There was also an informal plenary session immediately following Thursday's official session, wherein States would work to identify and establish an inventory of the "new and additional issues related to the agenda" of the CD and how they can be dealt with in a way which "would be positive for all."
Meetings with the Ambassadors of British and French missions
After lunch Colin Archer and myself went to the British mission’s office of
the UK permanent representative to the Conference on Disarmament at rues de
Vermont and was met by Ambassador David Broucher and his second Secretary Guy
Pollard.
The Ambassador said that he was retiring and not going to another job. His replacement will be John Freeman who is coming from NATO Headquarters. Colin commended him on UK’s new verification initiative to which he replied that it was a step in the right direction. We asked him if there was any initiative among the P5 for genuinely carrying forward the agenda for Nuclear Disarmament. He pointed to the Moscow agreement which provides for a further reduction of armaments between US and Russia (though without verification). On the new developments at Aldermaston he said there is no programme of developing new nukes in UK. On the issue of MDA he remarked that it was a formality by which US and UK have to sign the agreement every ten years and also it predates any NPT obligations.
On the subject of Trident he said the intention of UK government is to keep it as long as possible; no plans yet to replace it. On the 13 steps to implement NPT the Ambassador said that certain articles cannot be implemented, eg on ABM since US abrogated the treaty. On compliance with article 6 of the NPT by UK he came out with the favorite British line that UK will abolish all nuclear weapons as long as other countries do the same. Until that happens it is a deterrent and UK government had no intention to get rid of that option. The visit to the French embassy was more interesting since Amb. Rivasseaux was far more forthcoming and willing to discuss matters in depth. He said France was the 'best student in the disarmament class' and had no intentions of producing a new generation of weapons. He was surprisingly optimistic given the general pessimism regarding the CD and NPT. France clearly views the main problem as the US-UK axis under Bush and Blair.
The rest of the day was given over to general strategy discussion, where the
main issue was the Mayors for Peace initiative. The following contribution was
made by Aaron Tovish who is working for the City of Hiroshima.
Campaign Report: November 2003 - July 2004
Campaign Launch, Nagasaki, DATE November 2003:
In a speech by Nagasaki Mayor Iccho Itoh before over two thousand participants
in the Second Citizen's Assembly for the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons, the
Campaign was given a rousing launch. Messages came from many international
supporters, most notably London Mayor Ken Livingstone, as well as from Hiroshima
Mayor Tadatoshi Akiba.
Euro-Parliament Endorsement, Brussels, 26 February 2004:
A resolution by the European Parliament on the European Union's role in the NPT
review process expressed "its support for the international Mayors'
campaign - initiated by the Mayors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki - on nuclear
disarmament." A roll call on this operative paragraph revealed large
majorities supporting the Campaign in all the political groupings except the
very smallest one. The vote totals: 406 for; 55 against.
Mayoral Delegation to the NPT, New York City, 27-28 April 2004:
In the first major milestone of the Emergency Campaign, Mayors for Peace formed
a Mayoral Delegation to bring the 2020 Vision Campaign to the awareness of the
government officials engaged in the NPT review process. Nine mayors and seven
deputy mayors from eleven countries, as well as representatives from five
additional U.S. and British cities, took part in two days of intense political
activity. Seven members of the Delegation delivered speeches to a plenary
session of the NPT Preparatory Committee calling for the total elimination of
nuclear weapons by 2020. The Delegation met with top UN officials; with
multinational representatives of the Non-Aligned Movement, the European Union,
and the New Agenda Coalition; and with Government representatives of the United
States, China, Russia, Brazil, and India.By consistent advocacy of the 2020
Vision, NPT member states were challenged to reconsider the pace and coherence
of their faltering step-by-step approach. The dynamism of the Delegation made it
clear that Mayors will be major presence in 2005. To that end, the Delegation
met with New York City Councilors and with many NGO activists. The work of the
Mayoral Delegation is recorded in a comprehensive report and was captured on
video.
U.S. Conference of Mayors Resolution, Boston, 27 June 2004:
Three U.S. members of Mayors for Peace submitted a resolution to the U.S.
Conference of Mayors' annual meeting. The resolution, citing the 2020 Vision,
"calls upon the U.S. President to support a decision by the 2005 NPT Review
Conference to commence negations on the prohibition and elimination of nuclear
weapons." It was adopted by acclamation.
"2020Vision Campaign; Mayors for Peace" video completed, New York,
9 July 2004
The work of the Mayoral Delegation has documented by Haloco Ideas in a
broadcast-quality 45-minute video program. A two-minute preview is on the Mayors
for Peace website, and there is a five-minute "coming attraction" for
busy mayors to view. The video follows the Mayoral Delegation through its two
days of work at the United Nations, New York City Hall, and the 9/11 ground
zero. Three 'tangents' are devoted to Hibakusha, Youth, and the World Peace
Fair. The hopeful 2020 Vision is contrasted with the melted lens of glasses from
a elderly victim of the Hiroshima atomic bombing. Mayor Akiba envisions "a
world where something like this can never happen again." 2020 Vision is
available to members of Mayors for Peace without charge.
Campaign Plans: August 2004 - May 2005
See the attached one-page sheets for more detailed descriptions of each major
activity.
Year of Remembrance and Action for a Nuclear Weapon Free World; Aug'04-
Aug'05
In anticipation of the 60th Anniversary, people everywhere are being asked to
engage in activity that remembers Hiroshima and Nagasaki and upholds the vision
of a nuclear-weapon-free world. During "The Year," Mayors can reach
out effectively to other public figures - actors, artists, athletes, scholars,
scientists, etc. - and involve them in the nuclear-weapon-free-world movement.
Television can be encouraged to contribute by showing the 2020 Vision video,
and young people by helping to build the Protective Wall of International Law.
Mayoral Statement Signature Drive, Aug'04 - Jan 'OS
Mayors for Peace believe Heads of Government should assume direct responsibility
for the all-important NPT Review Conference. A statement to that end, based on
the U.S. Conference of Mayors resolution, is being circulated for signature by
mayors in countries around the world. Mayors can sign it and promote it with
their counterparts in other cities. The signature drive will be wound up in
early January so that the international results will available for use by the
National Mayoral Delegations.
National Mayoral Delegations Consult with Governments, January-February'05
It must be brought to the attention of Heads of Government that mayors are
calling on them to act at the NPT Review Conference. In many countries, a
National Mayoral Delegation will be formed to present the Mayoral Statement
signed by their fellow mayors. The Delegation will be able to refer to the
international results of the drive as well. Since the Government will still be
preparing for the Review Conference, these consultations can help to shape its
policy there. To that end, the Delegation will also visit the Ministries of
Foreign Affairs and of Defense and Parliament.
Cities of the World Peace Fair, Central Park, New York, 1 May 2005
The Great Lawn of Central Park will be turned in a huge map of the world upon
which hundreds of cities, large and small, will display their culture of music,
dance, art, cuisine, and Peace. Mayors for Peace will link up participating
cities with neighborhoods throughout Greater New York to make it both a truly
international and a truly New York event. There will be "regional"
stages and a "global" stage that features major performing artists.
With the International Law Wall winding through the Peace Fair, the unifying
theme will be a nuclear-weapon-free future.
Major Presence of Mayors at the NPT Review Conference, UN Headquarters, 2-4
May'05
Having called upon Heads of Government to attend the Review Conference, Mayors
will be out in force to hear them speak at the open session. The Mayors will
hold a conference of their own the following day; during the lunch, diplomats
will be invited to join them. On the third day, Mayors of some of the world's
largest cities will address a plenary session of the Review Conference. Mayors
should plan on arriving in New York before the Peace Fair and staying for at
least the first two days of the Review Conference.
Along side Mayors of peace there are other initiatives which deserve mentioning
A) Hiroshima-Nagasaki process for Nuclear Disarmament on the model
of Ottawa process to ban landmines which will run for the whole year of 2005
alongside the review conference.
B) German students initiative of ‘Protective wall of
international law’. The idea is to make small walls of bricks with logos and
take them to New York for the review conference. Their website is
1. WHEREAS, as long as nuclear weapons exist, cities around the world will be
vulnerable to instantaneous devastation on a scale exceeding even that
experienced by Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945; and
2. WHEREAS, a nuclear war would devastate many cities, an accidental missile
launch would devastate several cities, and use of a nuclear weapon by terrorists
would devastate a city; and
3. WHEREAS, any nuclear attack would obliterate City Hall and all emergency
response mechanisms rendering any city "planning" for such a disaster
utterly futile; and
4. WHEREAS, the world's foremost line of defense against nuclear-dangers is the
Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) which is currently in its seventh review
cycle, with all parties to the treaty scheduled to meet next May to ensure that
the treaty is being fully implemented; and
5. WHEREAS, all other weapons of mass destruction have beenprohibited by
international agreement and are being eliminated under international control,
and the nuclear-weapon states party to the NPT have undertaken to pursue
negotiations in good faith on nuclear disarmament; and
6. WHEREAS, the international Court of Justice unanimously found in 1996 that
all states were obliged to "bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to
nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international
control;" and
7. WHEREAS, the World Conference of Mayors for Peace has launched an
international campaign calling on the 2005 NPT Review Conference to launch
negotiations on the elimination of nuclear weapons, to be concluded by 2010 and
fully implemented by 2020, also known as the 2020 Vision; and
8. WHEREAS, weapons of mass destruction have no place in a civilized world,
9. Now, therefore, be it resolved that the U.S. Conference of Mayors calls upon
the U.S. President to support a decision by the 2005 npt Review Conference to
commence negotiations on the prohibition and elimination of nuclear weapons and
nuclear-weapon-related materials, and
10. BE IT further resolved the U.S. Conference of Mayors shall remain engaged in
this matter until our cities are no longer under the threat of nuclear
devastation.
Forthcoming Events
1) London-European Social Forum at Alexandra Palace.
ESF office tel; 0044208809 5347
All statements of Conference on Disarmament are available at:
NGO’s Disarmament committee Meeting 2nd May 2003 and review of NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) Conference
Palais Des Nations Geneva
By Vijay Mehta vijay@ anglo-sphere.com
The meeting started by discussing NGO’s involvement in the Disarmament process and NPT review conference. How can we make a good contribution? At this moment Disarmament is going backward. We need to act together, incorporate the concerns of civil society and large number of NGO’s to speak as one to make diplomats and governments understand the importance of going forward in implementing the NPT treaty. It is an uphill task but we need to be present where ever there are weapons conferences.
The NPT review conference was on at the same time. It was agreed that it is important to know delegates of different countries attending the conference to discuss strategies. Critical Will website (http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org) and News in Review were placing all the NPT conference reports daily. It was requested that Sir Joseph Rotblat excellent speech be posted on the website. He was given the annual Linus Pauling award. There was a exhibition on the life of Linus Pauling twice Nobel Price winner once for chemistry in 1954 and for Peace in 1962.
The meeting started with the Ambassador of Hungary, president of the NPT conference telling us of what happened during the week of the conference. He said there were over two hundred presentations by different delegates from state parties to the NPT conference with a question’s and general debate afterwards. The question answer and debate happened for the first time after fierce lobbying from different NGO’s. It was a matter of immense relief that the Nuclear Disarmament Agenda was not hijacked by war on Iraq and status of North Korea. Otherwise the delegates would have spent two weeks just discussing that and not getting on with negotiations of Nuclear Disarmament.
Among the things coming out of NPT review conference were as follows:
However there was general dissatisfaction on progress, transparency of national reports by state parties and it was the feeling of the NGO committee that disarmament was a non issue. It was stated that the reports should be different and standardised approach to reports should be formed keeping in view of the goals of NPT. The differences among the state parties on ways to go forward, how international agreements should be legally binding and enforcement procedures still remain a serious issue.
It was urged that NGO should press for more involvement with the NTP and CD conferences as a way forward. A multilateral agreement was seen as a road map for moving forward like the plan in Middle East, but it was an issue which did not have universal consensus. It was discussed that if a state party disassociate itself with NPT (like North Korea) efforts should be made to bring them back to the club.
Proposals for Seminar on nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, November 2003, Geneva, NPT Prep Comm 2004 and NPT, review conference 2005 in New York were discussed.
It was urged that landmines, cluster bombs, small arms, explosive remnants of war, biological, chemical and outer space weapons should also form an important part of the whole process of the disarmament issues.
All the officers for NGO committee for disarmament were elected unopposed except David Hay-Edie replaced David Attwood as president who was in the role for last eight years. Regina Hagen replaced Brain Cooper as vice-president as Brain had resigned earlier. Colin Archer as usual put in tremendous amount of work in preparing all the agenda and other papers to make the committee meeting a success.
The following calendar of events in various disarmament fields was announced:
| Nuclear Weapons: Conference on Disarmament | |
| Nuclear Test Ban: CTBTO event, Vienna September | |
| Small Arms: (26-30 May) (7-11 July, NY) + Geneva action Network on Small Arms | |
| Biological weapons: BTWC Convention Review Conference (Geneva, 10-14 November) | |
| Landmines: Ottawa Convention (May, September) | |
| Certain Conventional Weapons: Expert group on Explosive Remnants of War (16-27 June, 17-28 November) | |
| Advisory Board meeting for Disarmament Matters | |
| Other upcoming events (UNIDIR, Geneva Forum etc.) |
There were couple of important anniversaries coming up in 2005 for which ideas for events were invited:
It was urged that strong NGO presence at these events is necessary to take forward disarmament issues and push the lethargic process of NPT conference which is struggling in the hands of diplomats.
It was a great opportunity to network with various organisations and delegates from different countries of Europe, Japan, North Korea and USA.
For further information please contact:
Vijay Mehta MA
Vice-Chairman: Action for United Nations Renewal
Secretary: London CND (Campaign Against Nuclear Disarmament)
Editor: INLAP TIME (Institute for Law & Peace)
Founder Member: Non Violent Action Monthly Magazine
PO BOX 4256, London, E1 2WP, United Kingdom
TEL: 0207-790-4090 / 0207-702-7633 MOBILE: 07776-231-018
FAX: 0207-702-7264 Email: vijay@anglo-sphere.com